Comparative Analysis of Electrical Parameters of PV Modules Based on Measurements under Laboratory and Real Operating Conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17512/INSTAL.2026.06.01

Keywords:

photovoltaics, PV module diagnostics, PV electrical measurements, field measurements of PV modules, measurements under STC conditions

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of electrical parameters of photovoltaic modules determined under laboratory and real operating conditions. The study was conducted for two PERC-type crystalline silicon modules using a solar simulator (Endeas 650Lab) and a portable measurement system (Benning PV2 and SUN2). The main electrical parameters were determined and converted to standard test conditions (STC). The obtained results indicate good agreement between the two measurement methods, with differences not exceeding a few percent for most parameters. At the same time, it was shown that environmental conditions, in particular module temperature, may lead to significant discrepancies in the results. The inaccuracy of temperature determination under real operating conditions was identified as one of the main sources of measurement errors. Additional investigations demonstrated that the use of a thermal shield for the temperature sensor reduces the influence of external factors, such as wind, and improves the agreement between measurement results. The results confirm that portable measurement systems can be effectively used for PV module diagnostics, provided that appropriate measurement procedures are applied and sources of uncertainty are properly considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] E. Skoplaki, J.A. Palyvos, On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: A review of efficiency/power correlations, Solar Energy, Volume 83, Issue 5, 2009, pp. 614-624,.

[2] IEC 60904-1:2020, Photovoltaic devices – Part 1: Measurement of photovoltaic current-voltage characteristics, IEC, 2020.

[3] Photovoltaics Report — Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE with the support of PSE Projects GmbH, Freiburg, 31 October 2025, www.ise.fraunhofer.de, dostęp: 2026.

[4] Olczak, P.; Olek, M.; Matuszewska, D.; Dyczko, A.; Mania, T. Monofacial and Bifacial Micro PV Installation as Element of Energy Transition—The Case of Poland. Energies 2021, 14, 499.

[5] Zdyb A, Szałas G, Sobczyński D. Performance assessment of bifacial photovoltaic modules based on multivariant simulation and outdoor measurements. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2025;26(2):24–32

[6] Drabczyk K, Sobik P, Starowicz Z, Gawlińska K, Pluta A, Drabczyk B (2019), "Study of lamination quality of solar modules with PMMA front layer". Microelectronics International, Vol. 36 No. 3 pp. 100–103

[7] Endeas Oy, QuickSun 650Lab – solar simulator for PV laboratories, materiały producenta, dostęp online: https://endeas.fi/quicksun-650lab/, dostęp: 2026.

[8] BENNING Power Electronics Pte Ltd. - Measuring Instruments for Photovoltaic materiały producenta https://www.benning.de/products-sg, dostęp: 2026.

[9] IEC 60904-9:2020, Photovoltaic devices – Part 9: Classification of solar simulator characteristics, IEC, 2020.

[10] Endeas Oy, QuickSun 650Lab User Manual, dokumentacja techniczna producenta

[11] IEC 60891:2021, Procedures for temperature and irradiance corrections to measured I–V characteristics, IEC, 2021.

[12] Benning GmbH, PV2 / SUN2 User Manual, dokumentacja techniczna producenta

[13] Duffie J.A., Beckman W.A., Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, Wiley, 2013.

[14] W. De Soto, S.A. Klein, W.A. Beckman, Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance, Solar Energy, Volume 80, Issue 1, 2006, pp. 78-88.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Drabczyk, K., Kulesza-Matlak, G., & Banaś, K. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Electrical Parameters of PV Modules Based on Measurements under Laboratory and Real Operating Conditions. Instal, 6, 24-29. https://doi.org/10.17512/INSTAL.2026.06.01