Destruction of the city's architectural landscape and its memory (on the example of Kharkіv)
Słowa kluczowe:
evolution of the city, architectural landscape, cultural memory, architectural language, city identityAbstrakt
Using the example of the city of Kharkiv in Ukraine, the evolution of the architectural environment of a historical city and its destruction during military operations is considered. It is shown that during social cataclysms, significant changes occur in the structure of the urban environment and architectural language, which is reflected in the appearance of buildings, ensembles and the landscape as a whole. To describe these processes, such new concepts for architectural theory as “architectural landscape”, “cultural memory”, “traces” and their “layering” are proposed. It is emphasized that in the process of forming the authentic landscape of the city, both positive and negative changes occur, which need to be investigated. Identifying their features will allow the development of modern strategies for urban planning interventions in the historical city. Fixing the main structural features of the authentic multi-layered landscape will prevent the destruction of the bright artistic compositions of cultural heritage created over the centuries and help in developing modern strategies for urban planning interventions in the historical city.
Bibliografia
[1] Rossi A., L'architettura della città, 1ª ed. originale, 1966.
[2] Jo S., Rossi A., Architecture and Memory, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering (JAABE) 2003, 2, 1, 237.
[3] Halbwachs M., On Collective Memory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1992.
[4] Dobson S., Remembering in the city: characterising urban change, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism 2011, 35(2), 104-109, https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JAU/article/view/5619.
[5] Remizova O., Architectural memory and forms of its existence, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism 2020, 44(2), 97-108, DOI: 10.3846/jau.2020.13053.
[6] Pavlides E., Architecture as Memory, Oz, 1990, 12, https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1196&context=oz.
[7] Wagih F. Youssef, Architecture: Space, Place, and Memory. 2015, http://www.cpas-egypt.com/pdf/WagihFawzi/ Artical/Architecture_Space_Place_and_Memory[1].pdf.
[8] Remizova О., Didenko K., The traumas of Ukrainian modernist architecture and the challenges of its rehabilitation: a case study of the Tabachnyk Residential Complex in Kharkiv, The Journal of Architecture 2024, 29, 7-8, 1015-1035, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13602365.2025.2488939.
[9] Linda S., Value of the formal and iconological approaches for conceptualization of style in architecture, Architectural Studies 2015, Vol. 1, 1, 23-27.
[10] Remizova O., Polilohichnyi pryntsyp orhanizatsii urbanistychnoho prostoru. Kreatyvnyi urbanizm: do stolittia mistobudivnoi osvity u Lvivskii politekhnitsi, Zbirnyk Naukovykh Prats Kafedry Mistobuduvannia, 2014, Lviv: Vyd-vo Lvivskoi politekhniky, 302-307.